Entrevista a Valeria Berros y Stefano Saluzzo en radio “Mañana Uno” 106.3🎙️
En el marco de la segunda estancia de Stefano Saluzzo (UPO) a la Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales de la Universidad Nacional del Litoral, se llevó a cabo una entrevista en Radio Mañana Uno 106.3, donde y Valeria Berros (UNL-CONICET) compartieron los avances y perspectivas de sus investigaciones vinculadas a procesos de extractivismos e inversiones extranjeras.
Durante la conversación, se repasaron las actividades realizadas y por realizarse en el marco de la estancia, destacando especialmente el trabajo de campo llevado a cabo en Catamarca, donde investigan las dinámicas sociales, económicas, ambientales relacionadas con la extracción de litio.
Ecological-justice
La Constitución Ecosocial para Santa Fe ¿tiene quien la escriba?
La Reforma de la Constitución de Santa Fe necesita de un debate: cómo atendemos a los intereses de los propios ecosistemas, los reconocemos como sujetos de derechos y les asignamos guardianías. Qué dice el documento “Por una Constitución Ecosocial para Santa Fe”.
Intervista a Rodrigo Míguez Núñez su Humanist: dare voce alla natura non umana
In questa intervista, Rodrigo Míguez Núñez — principal investigator di Speak4Nature — racconta il percorso che lo ha portato a interrogarsi sul ruolo del diritto nella rappresentazione della natura non umana. A partire da una formazione giuridica centrata sull’essere umano, Míguez Núñez riflette sulla necessità di superare la visione antropocentrica per costruire un nuovo umanesimo ecologico, capace di ascoltare le voci di fiumi, foreste, paesaggi ed ecosistemi. Un dialogo ricco di spunti su giustizia ecologica, responsabilità condivisa e coesistenza tra tutte le forme di vita.
L’intervista è stata pubblicata da Humanist, progetto indipendente dedicato a raccontare il cambiamento culturale attraverso storie, visioni e progetti che mettono al centro le relazioni umane e il loro impatto sul mondo.
Ecological-justice
Quiero que Mañana Sea Como Ayer
En un contexto de negacionismo climático y retrocesos en materia de protección ambiental, en un aula de Derecho se reflexiona sobre lagartos, la legislación internacional sobre Diversidad Biológica, la preservación de los derechos conquistados y el futuro.
Con la frase que titula esta columna comenzamos el día. ¿Por qué?, le pregunto a mi hijo. Para salir a buscar zorros con mis amiguitos. Efectivamente, ayer vieron un zorro y rápidamente se convirtieron en pequeños exploradores improvisados de entre 4 y 10 años que caminaban con ramas de diferentes tamaños guardadas en sus pantalones o utilizadas como bastones para ir al encuentro de otros zorros y saber dónde y cómo viven y qué comen sin la intermediación de ninguna pantalla o reja de zoológico.
¿Hasta cuándo habrá zorros habitando tan cerca de Santa Fe?, pensé. Este es un tema recurrente para mí. Hace un tiempo escribí una crónica inspirada en la interacción y mirada sobre un lagarto overo y siento estar ahora escribiendo su secuela en un particular contexto: terminó la COP 16 del Convenio Marco de Diversidad Biológica, que finalizó con ciertos avances, pero también con interrogantes y desafíos que permanecen abiertos.
Esta Conferencia de Partes se desarrolló en la ciudad de Cali en Colombia. Participaron casi 200 Estados que han ratificado este Convenio y un gran número de organizaciones no gubernamentales, expertos y otros actores sociales que se ocupan del tema. El vínculo entre extinción acelerada de especies y cambio climático, las opciones para avanzar en mayores niveles y superficies de protección, las estrategias para fortalecer la participación de comunidades locales e indígenas en la toma de decisiones, así como la manera de movilizar y disponer de los recursos necesarios para conservar especies fueron algunos de los principales temas abordados en la localidad colombiana. Estas agendas de discusión y acuerdos globales repercuten de manera directa en las realidades nacionales: cada Estado Parte debe configurar su propia estrategia local. La Estrategia Nacional de Biodiversidad y Plan de Acción propuesta por Argentina fue presentada este último 30 de octubre como resultado de un proceso participativo de varios años en el que confluyeron un conjunto de sectores y jurisdicciones y que ha sido coordinado por la Comisión Nacional de Biodiversidad. Su implementación abre múltiples interrogantes en un contexto de negacionismo climático y retrocesos en materia de protección ambiental, pero resulta clave para lograr que sigamos conviviendo con especies de todo tipo que ven disminuir año a año su número a causa de la destrucción ininterrumpida de sus hábitats.
Para eso, pienso, se necesita que mañana sea como ayer en el sentido de continuar conviviendo con las especies de ese ayer. Pero, a su vez, se requiere de un mañana que no sea como ayer: el tiempo corre veloz y los desafíos se acrecientan ante un destino que se nos muestra cada vez más trágico.
Vuelvo ahora al lagarto. Varias personas me hablaron sobre esa columna, pero realmente nunca sabemos hasta donde llegan las palabras que dejamos plasmadas en diferentes sitios. Es difícil saberlo, pero a veces algunas coyunturas facilitan esa tarea. Los riesgos ambientales y las injusticias socioecológicas tienen mayor presencia en los debates contemporáneos y las aulas universitarias no son una excepción. En un trabajo práctico de estudiantes de Derecho (mis estudiantes) encontré algunas frases inspiradoras a propósito de ese texto que les ofreció mi compañero de cátedra. Me llamó la atención que algo del orden de lo efímero y lo simbólico haya sido colocado en el centro de sus pensamientos. Dicen, por ejemplo: la imagen de Stefano, capturando el lagarto se convierte en un símbolo de lo efímero y lo valioso.
Luego afirman que la autora de la nota intenta recuperar una identidad conectada con la naturaleza, representada por su relación simbólica con el lagarto y cierran esa sección con una frase hermosa: “La presencia efímera del lagarto puede entenderse como una resistencia simbólica ante esta tendencia a la individualización y la desconexión”.
El Convenio sobre Diversidad Biológica forma parte de nuestro sistema legal hace 30 años. Es parte de ese derecho que estudian en la Facultad en que doy clases. Pareciera estar bastante lejos de ser efímero. Sin embargo, en algunas clases, estudiantes me comienzan a plantear de modo recurrente el temor por la pérdida de derechos conquistados. A su vez, 30 años de vigencia de este Convenio se podrían pensar contrapuestos a lo cada vez más efímeras que pueden resultar nuestras posibilidades de convivir con un sinnúmero de especies: un mañana muy distinto al ayer.
Además de lo fugaz también apareció el valor de lo simbólico. Y aquí me quiero detener en una imagen que condensa algo de nuestra coyuntura en la que la educación pública y el sistema científico y tecnológico, esos espacios en los que se forma a buena parte de quienes se dedican a conocer más sobre hábitats, especies y conservación, se encuentran bajo ataque permanente.
En el último teórico que di en una de las materias en que trabajo, me despedí y se sucedieron una serie de episodios. Vino este grupo de estudiantes y me dijo que primero no tenían ningún interés en esto del lagarto pero que cuando leyeron realmente la crónica me agradecieron por escribirla. Mientras tanto espontáneamente me estaban aplaudiendo en el aula, no me había pasado esto antes. Creían, tal vez, que me aplaudían a mí, pero en el fondo esos aplausos combinaban algo de lo efímero y lo simbólico: todo eso que –sabemos– se condensa en las aulas de la universidad pública argentina. Ese lugar en el que se forman quienes saben que los derechos conquistados pueden perderse y puede costar mucho recuperarlos y que las especies pueden extinguirse aceleradamente y sin retorno.
En ese mismo escritorio una semana antes se recibió un estudiante. Cuando terminó el examen nos dijo: me recibí, soy primera generación. El ayer de las personas que pasan por la universidad pública no es igual al mañana, y a la vez en esas aulas hay momentos que combinan lo simbólico y lo efímero y grafican todo ese ayer que necesitamos cuidar para tener un mañana.
Ecological-justice
Interview: Justicia Ecológica para la Tierra
Interview with Rodrigo Míguez Núñez, professor at the University of Piemonte Orientale (Italy); Valeria Berros, professor at the National University of the Litoral (Argentina); and Leticia Alburquerque, professor at the Federal University of Santa Catarina (Brazil). Presented and moderated by Pedro Lomas, FUHEM Ecosocial.
A new approach to human-nature relationships is urgently needed. Ecological justice emphasizes equity with the environment, future generations, and other species. This session of the Debates for Inclusive Thinking explores key elements underlying the emergence of a new justice paradigm focused on the rights of nature. The socio-ecological crisis challenges how we interact with nature, particularly regarding its appropriation and associated impacts. Historically, environmental law and justice have treated nature as an object of human relationships rather than a subject with its own interests. This approach is increasingly questioned and deemed insufficient.
The emergence of ecological justice highlights the intrinsic values of nature, recognizing it as a rights-bearing subject with interests that require representation and defense, akin to those of humans. This shift moves beyond the limitations of anthropocentrism, driving significant developments in legal frameworks. Notable examples include the constitutional recognition of nature’s rights in Ecuador (2008) and Bolivia (2009), the failed draft constitution in Chile, and numerous constitutional court rulings worldwide. These examples reflect a growing momentum to transcend traditional human-centric perspectives and establish new, inclusive principles in the human-nature relationship.
End-of-year Reflections: Speak4Nature’s Achievements in 2024 and Goals for the Future
As 2024 comes to a close, Speak4Nature wishes to share a reflection on the activities carried out and milestones achieved, extending its gratitude to the consortium partners and everyone who contributed to the project’s success.
The year 2024 saw the consortium, led by the Università del Piemonte Orientale (UPO), deeply engaged in international events, workshops, and seminars that strengthened the discourse on ecological justice, its connection to human rights, and the intrinsic value of non-human nature. Speak4Nature aims to unite academia and civil society in the fight against environmental crises and to advocate for the legal recognition of nature’s intrinsic value from the perspectives of rights and duties. To this end, the project partners have organized various events involving scholars and members of civil society from different disciplines and organizations.
January in Madrid: non-anthropocentric values and ecological justice
The year began with the first training course on the theoretical aspects of ecological justice titled “Why is Nature Valuable?”, hosted at the Toledo Campus of Universidad Carlos III in Madrid, spanning two days:
January 25: The workshop “The Inherent Value of Non-Human Nature” presented project findings on the intrinsic value of non-human nature, with discussions on ecological justice and legal theory. Highlights from the event included Joaquín Valdivieso’s lecture “Is Inherent Value Non-Anthropocentric?”.
January 26: The on-site training event “Human and Non-Human Rights in Legal Theory” explored the role of anthropocentrism in law and the shift towards ecocentric approaches. The event featured contributions from internal and external experts.
April in Florianópolis: transcontinental dialogues on ecological justice
The Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina in Florianópolis served as the ideal setting for the second major event of the year, hosting the First Speak4Nature Network School. Two main events took place:
April 8: The workshop “Human Rights and Ecological Justice” brought together project partners to discuss key themes related to human rights and ecological justice.
April 9–15: The First Speak4Nature Network School was a unique meeting point for students, researchers, professionals, and members of civil society. Over the course of an entire week, the event featured contributions from experts in the field coming from various European and Latin American locations. The Network School focused on ecological justice, its relationship with human rights, and themes related to natural law theory and the intrinsic value of nature. Additionally, local experts provided pragmatic insights during discussions about the Lagoa da Conceição case in Florianópolis. On the final day of the activity, the main research funding policies at both European and international levels were presented, thanks to a contribution from APRE Italia. Finally, participants in the Network School visited the communities living on the shores of Lagoa da Conceição, the largest lagoon in Florianópolis, which was the site of an environmental disaster in 2021 whose effects are still felt today. During the visit, participants were guided through the lagoon’s stunning landscapes by representatives of the NGO Costa Legal, who explained the ongoing legal process aimed at recognizing the rights of Lagoa da Conceição.
October in Europe: assessments and future directions
October marked a pivotal moment for Speak4Nature project, with two key events that fostered dialogue among partners and solidified the project’s outcomes.
October 7: The Mid-Term Meeting was held at the Luigi Einaudi Campus in Turin, offering an opportunity to evaluate project progress, address organizational and scientific matters, and facilitate collaboration among consortium members. Nearly all Principal Investigators of the project joined the meeting in person, ensuring productive and enriching exchanges.
October 9–10: In Munich, the workshop “The Political Implementation of Nature’s Inherent Value” showcased the project’s findings on the political theory of nature’s intrinsic value. Contributions came from both internal and external experts, and the event included a guided visit to Hermannsdorf Organic Farm, a practical example of sustainable and responsible resource management.
Cross-cutting initiatives and thematic webinars
Beyond the main events, the project continues to emphasize the significance of secondments in fostering collaboration and advancing research. The S4N Seminar Series, held across the consortium’s institutions, provides a vital platform for interdisciplinary and intersectoral dialogue among researchers in secondments.
Additionally, a webinar organized by the Università del Piemonte Orientale (UPO) and the Universidad Nacional del Litoral (UNL) addressed the challenges of lithium extraction in Argentina’s Salar del Hombre Muerto. This webinar highlighted the role of strategic legal cases in ecological justice, building on the approach introduced during the First Speak4Nature Network School to connect theoretical concepts with local issues.
Gratitude and aspirations for 2025
The achievements of 2024 were made possible by the dedication and collaboration of researchers, partners, students, and supporters. To all who contributed to the project’s success, we extend our heartfelt thanks.
As we look ahead to 2025, we face new challenges with hope and optimism. Speak4Nature remains committed to advancing ecological justice, the recognition of nature’s intrinsic value, and the creation of a more equitable and socio-ecologically sustainable world.
Together, we will continue to expand knowledge, foster interdisciplinary dialogue, and transform ideas into actionable solutions. Thank you for being part of this journey, we look forward to collaborating with you in 2025 for another year of shared progress and innovation.
Ecological-justice
El clamor de la tierra por una justicia ecológica
Pedro L. Lomas
2024
The article raises dissatisfaction with the anthropocentric framework for environmental law and justice, which is reflected in the growing need that arises in different areas to confront human-nature relationships beyond instrumental values and individualistic ethics that these promote. From this dissatisfaction, new ecological law and justice are emerging that, although with a certain inevitable epistemological anthropocentrism, aim to overcome this framework, generating all kinds of innovative tools.
Prohibido Ver lo Obvio: La DANA, o de un Mundo con un Clima Quebrado
Written by Adrián Almazán, Pedro Lomas and Luis Lloredo Alix
In the wake of Mediterranean storms, this text highlights the tragic toll of ignored climate warnings, government negligence, and the need for solidarity-led resilience. Speak4Nature calls for eco-social justice and degrowth, urging a redefined relationship with ecosystems and institutions that respect nature.
Reconnecting nature and agriculture: emancipatory practices in agroecology
Carolina Yacamán Ochoa, UAM
2024
Agroecology, which emerged in the mid-1990s, originated as a form of resistance to the transformations in local food systems brought about by the Green Revolution, monoculture practices, industrialization, colonial dynamics, and the growing corporate control over seeds and food production that created the actual ecological breakdown. In recent years, it has evolved by adopting a holistic framework (based on 10 elements), not only promoting significant practices to mitigate one of the major environmental impacts of industrialized food systems on climate change—by reducing dependence on fossil fuels, and synthetic inputs (efficiency) in favor of nutrient recycling and organic matter utilization (synergies) and promoting closed energy loops (circular economy) —but it also strives to restore food sovereignty to enhance community resilience.
FAO’s 10 elements of agroecology framework to guide transformative change pathways towards sustainable food and agricultural systems (FAO, 2018)
In contrast to the dominant corporate food regimes, agroecology reinforces non-capitalistic, peasant, and indigenous livelihoods, while safeguarding traditional and biocultural knowledge. This is done mainly by redistributing productive assets like seeds and land among local communities (natural resource governance) and reshaping food practices (soil health, animal health, enhanced biodiversity) through commons-based approaches essential for the reproduction of life. It promotes democratic control over the means of production, while promoting harmony with nature (human and social values)
In the following paragraphs, we will discuss emancipatory practices aimed at reconnecting nature with agriculture and integrating diverse traditional worldviews. These practices enrich the agroecological approach by framing it within a biocentric perspective, linking it to the commons, and emphasizing the preservation of cultural diversity, the genetic richness of seeds, ancestral knowledge, and respect for ecosystems.
Minga – a cultural and ancestral Andean practice- deeply rooted in a collective effort for community benefit and preserving indigenous worldviews is a tradition that is closely aligned with agroecological principles. Tthe focus extends beyond sustainable farming methods to fortifying community bonds through social organization (participation)— and mutual support values that are intrinsic to the Minka concept. When community members come together to do collective agricultural tasks or construct communal projects, they engage in a form of agroecological practice by fostering a self-supporting community structure. This commoning practice embeds local food systems and strengthens community cohesion.
Agroecology, a practice grounded in principles of biodiversity preservation, finds an ally in seed bank movements like Navdanya in India, the Seed Guardians Network in Quito, and La Troje in Spain. These agroecological networks preserve native seeds, which is fundamental for maintaining biological and cultural diversity in farming systems. Seed banks directly address impacts created by the industrial agricultural model, such as the loss of genetic diversity and dependence on patented GMO seeds. By emphasizing peasant-led practices for seed conservation and non-profit exchanges, these movements not only secure food sovereignty but also empower local communities, enhancing their self-reliance and democratizing food production in the face of corporate food system pressures.
The Rural Schools of Agroecology (ECAS) in the Andes Tulueños and the Universidad Autónoma Indígena Intercultural (UAIIN) in Colombia exemplify a critical approach of co-creation and sharing different types of knowledge (diálogo de saberes). These institutions illustrate the importance of valuing and sharing different dialogs and practices throughout the life cycle, involving different actors like the family, spiritual authority, community, cultural and political authorities. Their approach leverages ancestral knowledge to manage holistically the food systems and to improve agrobiodiversity, including the production of medicinal, ornamental, and food plants. This diversity is essential to reinforce the spiritual and cultural connections that communities have maintained with nature across generations, emphasizing the deep ties between cultural diets and food traditions.
Specifically, the UAIIN aims to recognize the collective memory, wisdom, and traditional practices acquired from the roots of indigenous cosmovision, allowing a deeper understanding of Mother Earth. Additionally, they view education within the context of the eco-social crisis as a means to strengthen worldviews, local economies, and food sovereignty. To achieve this, they utilize horizontal pedagogical processes that share local, technical, and academic knowledge, particularly through indigenous peasant farmer exchanges, fostering the creation of community bonds and promoting good living (Buen Vivir). It is also essential for building political movements necessary to achieve deep transformations. This institution, along with many others engaged in biocultural critical thinking, are essential for constructing a political narrative rooted in frameworks that shape alternative collective rationalities within their respective territories.
XVII Weekend of Nature. Puerto Nariño, Amazonas, Colombia (2022). Ph. Carolina Yacamán
These examples highlight the significant contributions of agroecological movements that have a collective political project dedicated to defending indigenous and peasant agriculture, their traditional practices, and common goods—elements that are crucial for transitioning towards a degrowth world. These examples become even more critical when considering the negative externalities—such as resource depletion, air, land, and water pollution, greenhouse gas emissions, and biodiversity loss—resulting from the growing dependence on petrochemical-intensive agriculture. In this context promoting food as a common versus a commodity becomes essential. Finally, at the heart of the socio-ecological crisis, agroecology gains strength with its political, scientific, and social dimensions to facilitate pathways of transformative change towards territorially-based, resilient, and culturally appropriate food systems.
Gliessman, S. (2018). Defining Agroecology, Agroecology and Sustainable
Rosset, P., Barbosa, L. P., Val, V., & McCune, N. (2021). Pensamiento Latinoamericano Agroecológico: the emergence of a critical Latin American agroecology?. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, 45(1), 42-64.
Shiva, V. (2016). The dharma of food. In Religion and Sustainable Agriculture, ed. T. Le Vasseur, P. Parajuli, and N. Wirzba, 125–133, vi-ix. Kentucky: Univ. Press of
Toledo, V. (2022). Agroecology and spirituality: reflections about an unrecognized link, Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, DOI: 10.1080/21683565.2022.2027842
Ecological-justice
“Camps for Ecological Justice”: From the University to the Territory
Public universities in Latin America play a key role in promoting science and culture. They also hold a prominent role in fostering critical citizenship and generating knowledge that contributes to social well-being. Within universities, three main functions can be identified: teaching, research, and extension (also called third mission). The latter is the central focus of this text, and involves the development and implementation of activities outside the university scope that allow participants to engage with the complexities of the surrounding social reality. This function facilitates addressing various issues from an interdisciplinary perspective, enabling the creation of accurate diagnoses and the development of better tools and proposals for solving specific cases. It is based on dialogue, solidarity, and commitment, and it aims at applying theoretical learning acquired in the classroom to real and concrete situations. In this way, knowledge construction is carried out through experience in the field, through the interaction with people facing real and, often, urgent problems.
At the Universidad Nacional del Litoral (UNL), which comprises ten faculties and other dependencies, extension projects are part of an institutional policy and are carried out by teams composed of faculty members, students, graduates, researchers, and volunteers. These teams work on various issues in collaboration with civil society organizations, governmental institutions, and the general public, according to the scientific knowledge areas of each academic unit and the strategic lines defined by the university.
San José del Rincón, Province of Santa Fe, Argentina (2023), Ph. Nicolás Ferrucci
The “Camps for Ecological Justice” are a Socially Relevant Extension Project (PEIS), a specific modality within the extension practice of the UNL, conducted by the School of Law and Social Sciences since 2019. These Camps are developed within the framework of a research project called “Meulen: Renewal of Legal Contributions on the Ecological Problem,” where, after several years of research, extension projects related to themes relevant to their research objectives, began to be developed, such as nature rights, the environment, access to justice, animal rights, among others. These Camps are a joint effort between the extension team and two civil society organizations linked to addressing socio-environmental conflicts: the Center for Nature Protection (CEPRONAT) and Capibara NDS, along with social actors linked to the territory.
The project was designed to contribute to the internal and territorial organization of neighbors, previously absent or incipient, to achieve greater autonomy when making claims, workshops, and training, taking legal actions, or creating regulations on the environmental problems that affect their daily lives. It includes, as a methodological innovation, a collective and participatory construction on the existing socio-environmental problems in different geographical areas, which also allows the articulation of the field of law (particularly environmental law, nature rights, and human rights) with other areas of knowledge (medicine, agrarian sciences, environmental sciences, and conservation).
It is noteworthy that it acquired a new dimension from 2021, when the Escazú Agreement came into force: a Regional Human Rights Agreement on Access to Information, Public Participation, and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters in Latin America and the Caribbean, which introduced an unprecedented global obligation to States to ensure the protection of environmental defenders. Its objectives, principles, rights, and protection mechanisms align with the extension activity.
The Camps have a two-side purpose: to gather information on socio-environmental issues to understand the situation of certain populations in the Province of Santa Fe (Argentina) with the aim of the creation of potential public policies, regulations, and other instruments that
enable improved environmental protection, human rights, and nature rights; and to provide the population with the necessary information and tools to defend their rights.
Each Camp is structured around three central stages. First, a preparatory stage, in which the town where the camp will be held is selected, and the extension team is constituted. Then, the survey to be used is designed, activities are planned, and the location is mapped to determine the areas to visit. Additionally, the team is trained for fieldwork. Second, the execution stage, which consists of two distinct days: one to survey the population and another to do activities aimed at children, adults, and the elderly, with the goal of disseminating information, training, fostering dialogue and meetings, and creating a space for listening and exchange. Lastly, after the field activity, the third stage is carried out, where the extension team processes the collected data, prepares reports, articles, and other dissemination works, and returns to the location to deliver the information to the community.
Additionally, complementary activities can be carried out according to the needs of each community, such as school visits, awareness campaigns, communication with authorities, and interviews with local leaders to delve deeper into the identified problems.
Arroyo Leyes, Province of Santa Fe, Argentina (2023), Ph. Nicolás Ferrucci
In its first five years, the “Camps for Ecological Justice” have visited the locations of Santo Domingo, Humboldt, Arroyo Leyes, Rincón, and Monte Vera in the Province of Santa Fe. In the coming years, these activities are to extend to new communities, reinforcing the commitment to knowledge dissemination and social action in the region.
Direct interaction with communities has enriched the educational and research process, strengthened community bonds, and has fostered citizen participation and empowerment. This demonstrates that academic knowledge, articulated with local needs, can generate significant changes in societies. We are driven by the conviction that, through dialogue, solidarity, and commitment, it is possible to build a fairer and more sustainable future for all, in which the public university will continue to be a fundamental pillar in fostering ecological justice and shared well-being.
Further readings and resources
Balaudo, C. G.; Franco, D. L.; Gazzo, M. V. y Rodríguez, A. (2021). Acampe por una justicia ecológica: una experiencia de extensión y acceso a la justicia en la localidad de Santo Domingo, provincia de Santa Fe. +E: Revista de Extensión Universitaria, 11(15), e0010. doi: 10.14409/extension.2021.15.Jul-Dic.e0010
Erreguerena, F.; Nieto, G. y Tommasino, H. (2020). Tradiciones y matrices, pasadas y presentes, que confluyen en la Extensión Crítica Latinoamericana y Caribeña. Cuadernos de Extensión Universitaria de la UNLPam,4(4), 177–204.
Wrunsten, A. (2023). Universidad, extensión e integralidad. Claves para la democracia. +E: Revista de Extensión Universitaria, 13(19), e0005. doi: 10.14409/extension.2023.19.Jul-Dic.e0005
